logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Move from Toxics to Safer Alternatives

 

What's New

Overview

The soil underneath a local soccer field. The river that runs through the center of your town or city. The air circulating above a factory or industrial complex. The materials used to package our food. All are important components of our communities and are all extremely vulnerable to toxic contamination.

At the federal level, TexPIRG is backing the Ban Poisonous Additives Act (S. 593/H.R. 1523), which has as lead sponsors Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.).

There is simply no excuse, rationalization or justification to allow our toxic chemicals in the foods we eat and the products we buy for our children. That’s why we’re fighting to make sure our environment is safe, healthy and secure.

 



News



Reports

 



TexPIRG is working to ban the use of the chemical bisphenol A (BPA) in food and beverage containers. Even though the chemical is known to leach from packaging into food, BPA can be found in baby bottles, water bottles and food storage containers. It is used in epoxy resins that coat the lining of metal food cans, which include infant formula cans that expose our kids to repeated doses.

 

Click here for a more detailed version of this chart.
This scorecard reviews how leading packaged food companies are responding to increased consumer and investor concern about BPA. The scorecard ranks companies on three factors: 1) efforts to find and implement alternatives to BPA, 2) plans to phase out BPA in products for which alternatives exist, and 3) transparency on the issue. Chiquita, Dean Foods, Hormel, Sara Lee, SYSCO, and Unilever did not respond to the letters before the authors’ deadline. Each of these companies received an overall grade of F.

Source: Seeking Safer Packaging.

 

SEARCH THIS SITE